Gambit 106
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Gambit 106
Core surronded by BC's, Cannons, and a RL plus a SL 10 oclock ish.
Only took 2 attacks on 3/5/2015 but they were both 47+ lvl's.
The first attack by Angel of Death was top, and did minor mistakes. The only thing I would like to add is the beginning flares. I bet you would've saved a couple gbe if deploying your troops a different way. But don't get me wrong, it was a hell of an attack!
Second attack was by Sula_D. Being a lvl 47 is an important part in AnninetForces, but knowing when to attack is key. The only hard part after Angle's attack was a SL, and I bet 2 people who were around lvl 35 could have finished gambit. Good work though.
The only thing I like to add is when going into a op, and the only way in achieving this if we work as a team, and not independent.
Only took 2 attacks on 3/5/2015 but they were both 47+ lvl's.
The first attack by Angel of Death was top, and did minor mistakes. The only thing I would like to add is the beginning flares. I bet you would've saved a couple gbe if deploying your troops a different way. But don't get me wrong, it was a hell of an attack!
Second attack was by Sula_D. Being a lvl 47 is an important part in AnninetForces, but knowing when to attack is key. The only hard part after Angle's attack was a SL, and I bet 2 people who were around lvl 35 could have finished gambit. Good work though.
The only thing I like to add is when going into a op, and the only way in achieving this if we work as a team, and not independent.
gumdrum- Posts : 5
Join date : 2015-03-08
Re: Gambit 106
hi gumdrum, please do not get me wrong but what are we supposed to do with your discribtion of angles attack?? you discribe nothing, not the troops he used, not where he placed his troops, not where he flared what he shocked... you comment on his performance, which is obsolete...
i think you still dont know, what my intention was ? the base description is good!! everything after useless apart from mentioning a sl at the end
i am glad you do this! just become informative and leave out comments on the performance ))
i think you still dont know, what my intention was ? the base description is good!! everything after useless apart from mentioning a sl at the end
i am glad you do this! just become informative and leave out comments on the performance ))
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|